
Scales held perfectly level between one more treat and two more minutes, with a judge under four feet tall.
You hold the scale level: one small treat, weighed carefully against two more minutes of screen time, and you deliver the ruling with the calm gravity of a judge who has heard this exact case a thousand times before. Fairness matters here, and not because a small person can articulate why — because they can feel, instantly, when a ruling is arbitrary versus earned. You've learned to make it earned.
Justice, reborn as a parent at the kitchen table, isn't about winning the negotiation. It's about being consistent enough that the scales actually mean something. Today you'll hold that line — calm, fair, unmoved by escalating tactics — and somewhere in there, without announcing it, you'll be teaching a whole philosophy of fairness one bedtime negotiation at a time.
what may cross your path
I can be fair and firm in the same breath.
You said five minutes nine minutes ago, and the record shows it, because apparently there is a record, kept somewhere in a four-year-old's head with better accuracy than your own phone's timer. Counsel objects. Counsel objects loudly, and cites the exact wording you used, and you're left defending a ruling you already know you didn't enforce.
Justice reversed isn't corruption — it's just inconsistency, the scale tipping because you got distracted or tired or hoped nobody was counting. They were counting. They're always counting. This isn't a crisis; it's a data point. Reset the clock, name the slip honestly, and hold the next boundary a little more precisely.
what may cross your path
Being caught off doesn't mean I can't rule fairly next time.